Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 9 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 40.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 43.1% for MiMo-V2.5 and 51.5% for Muse Spark.
  • MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5 and Muse Spark specifications
MiMo-V2.5Muse Spark
ProviderXiaomiMeta
Noometry Index43.450.6
Released2026-04-222026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked2327

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Muse Spark
SciCode43.1%51.5%
LMArena Coding14691481
LMArena WebDev1438—
ALE-Bench513.95—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Muse Spark
CritPt3.7%11.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14501474
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Muse Spark
ProofBench16%17%
LMArena Math14361455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Expert14601457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Vision12471306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English14041464
LMArena Chinese14681509
LMArena French14471497
LMArena German14211497
LMArena Korean13631459
LMArena Russian13951466
LMArena Spanish14161472
LMArena Japanese1306—

Instruction Following Too close to call

MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following14341442

Long Context Too close to call

MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query14451451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Muse Spark
LMArena Text14281474
LMArena Creative Writing13931459
LMArena Multi-Turn14451477

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.5 or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 43.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Muse Spark share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper