Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs Mistral 7B

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Mistral 7B Mistral AI

23.0

Rank #351 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 40.8 to 7.4.
  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.25 for Mistral 7B.
  • MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 8K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5 and Mistral 7B specifications
MiMo-V2.5Mistral 7B
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index43.423.0
Released2026-04-222023-09-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M8K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$0.25
Results tracked2337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Mistral 7B
LMArena Coding14691082
LMArena WebDev1438—
SciCode43.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—19.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—27.3%
ALE-Bench513.95—
HumanEval+—36%
MBPP+—42.1%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Mistral 7B
LMArena Hard Prompts14501067
CritPt3.7%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—42.5%
Adversarial NLI—47.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—56.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—112.21
HellaSwag—81%
PIQA—83%
WinoGrande—75.3%

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Mistral 7B
LMArena Math14361085
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0.3%
ProofBench16%—
MATH Level 5—3.7%
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Mistral 7B
LMArena Expert14601036
GPQA Diamond—15.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.6%
BoolQ—87.4%
MMLU—62.5%
OpenBookQA—79.8%
TriviaQA—75.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), Mistral 7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Mistral 7B
LMArena Vision1247—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Mistral 7B
LMArena Non-English14041012
LMArena Chinese14681009
LMArena French14471037
LMArena German1421987
LMArena Japanese1306878
LMArena Russian13951018
LMArena Spanish14161026
LMArena Korean1363—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Mistral 7B
LMArena Instruction Following14341060

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Mistral 7B
LMArena Longer Query14451060

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Mistral 7B
LMArena Text14281090
LMArena Creative Writing13931068
LMArena Multi-Turn14451062

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Mistral 7B?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Mistral 7B?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Mistral 7B lists at $0.25 and $0.25.

Is MiMo-V2.5 or Mistral 7B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Mistral 7B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper