Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs Ministral 8B

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

28.2

Rank #325 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Ministral 8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 40.8 to 12.6.
  • Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.5.
  • MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5 and Ministral 8B specifications
MiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index43.428.2
Released2026-04-222024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output131K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$0.15
Results tracked2317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
LMArena Coding14691202
LMArena WebDev1438—
SciCode43.1%—
ALE-Bench513.95—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5: —, Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—11.1%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
LMArena Hard Prompts14501191
CritPt3.7%—
DTBench—45.7%

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
LMArena Math14361188
ProofBench16%—
MATH Level 5—14.9%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
LMArena Expert14601170
GPQA Diamond—27.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), Ministral 8B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
LMArena Vision1247—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
LMArena Non-English14041165
LMArena Chinese14681193
LMArena Russian13951195
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1421—
LMArena Japanese1306—
LMArena Korean1363—
LMArena Spanish1416—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
LMArena Instruction Following14341161

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
LMArena Longer Query14451212

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ministral 8B
LMArena Text14281191
LMArena Creative Writing13931175
LMArena Multi-Turn14451166

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Ministral 8B?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Ministral 8B?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Is MiMo-V2.5 or Ministral 8B better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Ministral 8B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper