Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs Ministral 3B
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 40.8 to 10.4.
- Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.5.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | Ministral 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 26.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.10 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | — |
| DTBench | — | 51.7% |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.1 |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1436 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Ministral 3B?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Ministral 3B?
Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 lists at $0.14 and $0.28.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Ministral 3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.