Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Phi-4 Mini

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.9

Rank #283 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.4 to 28.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 50.2% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
  • Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi-4 Mini specifications
MiMo-V2.5-ProPhi-4 Mini
ProviderXiaomiMicrosoft
Noometry Index45.230.9
Released2026-04-222024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output131K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.075
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.30
Results tracked273

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi-4 Mini
SciCode50.2%10.8%
LMArena WebDev1479—
LMArena Coding1503—
ALE-Bench899.8—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi-4 Mini
CritPt4%0%
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1488—
DTBench84.5%—
LMCA29.5%—

Math Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Phi-4 Mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi-4 Mini
ProofBench22%—
LMArena Math1481—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi-4 Mini
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.5%
LMArena Expert1503—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Non-English1449—
LMArena Chinese1507—
LMArena French1488—
LMArena German1458—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1437—
LMArena Russian1450—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Phi-4 Mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Instruction Following1477—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Phi-4 Mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Longer Query1483—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Phi-4 Mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi-4 Mini
LMArena Text1465—
LMArena Creative Writing1440—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1493—
EQ-Bench 41208—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Phi-4 Mini?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 4.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi-4 Mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper