Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 27.6.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderXiaomiMicrosoft
Noometry Index45.227.9
Released2026-04-222024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked2735

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding15031093
LMArena WebDev1479—
SciCode50.2%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
ALE-Bench899.8—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14881072
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%—
CritPt4%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
DTBench84.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
LMCA29.5%—
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14811111
ProofBench22%—
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert15031045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14491021
LMArena Chinese15071021
LMArena French14881076
LMArena German14581044
LMArena Japanese1412935
LMArena Korean1437905
LMArena Russian14501022
LMArena Spanish14711085

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14771053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14831044

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14651073
LMArena Creative Writing14401037
LMArena Multi-Turn14771018
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1493—
EQ-Bench 41208—
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper