Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 27.1.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderXiaomiMicrosoft
Noometry Index45.229.7
Released2026-04-222024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked2719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding15031039
LMArena WebDev1479—
SciCode50.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench899.8—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14881028
NYT Connections (extended)34.4%—
CritPt4%—
DTBench84.5%—
LMCA29.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math14811089
ProofBench22%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1503984

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14491000
LMArena Chinese15071016
LMArena French14881039
LMArena German14581006
LMArena Japanese1412899
LMArena Korean1437856
LMArena Russian14501004
LMArena Spanish14711059

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14771023

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1483996

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text14651050
LMArena Creative Writing14401024
LMArena Multi-Turn1477989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1493—
EQ-Bench 41208—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper