Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Muse Glimmer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 57.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 50.2% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 44.9% for Muse Glimmer.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | 1355 |
| SciCode | 50.2% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | 1416 |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 4% | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1396 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1417 |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | 1386 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1375 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1399 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Muse Glimmer?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Muse Glimmer share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.