Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 38.6 to 24.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 22% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 3% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- Both cost about the same: $0.43 input and $0.87 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 44.8 | 37.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 205K |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1477 | 1397 |
| SciCode | 50.2% | 47% |
| LMArena Coding | 1502 | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | 599.25 |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | 24.7% |
| CritPt | 4% | 0.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1487 | 1422 |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.84 |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84), MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 22% | 3% |
| LMArena Math | 1480 | 1420 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1443 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1439 |
| LMArena French | 1489 | 1422 |
| LMArena German | 1455 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1418 | 1261 |
| LMArena Korean | 1436 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | 1403 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1404 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1419 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47), MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1404 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1413 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than MiniMax-M2.7?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.