Model comparison
Mercury vs Wizardlm 13b
Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury leads 46.2 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mercury | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mercury leads
Mercury: 38.7 (#170), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1035 |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
Mercury: 17.5 (#293), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | 1018 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
Mercury: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
Multilingual Mercury leads
Mercury: 41.6 (#206), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Mercury leads
Mercury: 65.2 (#224), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1048 |
Long Context Mercury leads
Mercury: 38.4 (#198), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Mercury leads
Mercury: 46.2 (#221), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury better than Wizardlm 13b?
Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mercury or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mercury and Wizardlm 13b share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.