Model comparison

Mercury vs Solar Pro4

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 17.5.

Side by side

Mercury and Solar Pro4 specifications
MercurySolar Pro4
ProviderInceptionUpstage
Noometry Index37.642.1
Released—2026-08-06
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—524K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Solar Pro4 leads

Mercury: 38.7 (#170), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercurySolar Pro4
LMArena Coding13221437
LMArena WebDev—1371

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

Mercury: 17.5 (#293), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercurySolar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts12851399
Kagi LLM Benchmark21.6%—

Math Not comparable

Mercury: —, Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercurySolar Pro4
LMArena Math—1416

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury: —, Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercurySolar Pro4
LMArena Expert—1427

Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads

Mercury: 41.6 (#206), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercurySolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English12601361
LMArena Chinese—1415
LMArena French—1397
LMArena German—1364
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1382
LMArena Russian—1360
LMArena Spanish—1401

Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads

Mercury: 65.2 (#224), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercurySolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following12391377

Long Context Solar Pro4 leads

Mercury: 38.4 (#198), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercurySolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query12661381

Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads

Mercury: 46.2 (#221), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercurySolar Pro4
LMArena Text12821386
LMArena Creative Writing11911316
LMArena Multi-Turn12821385

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mercury or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mercury and Solar Pro4 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper