Model comparison

Mercury vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Mercury and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.6 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 55.3 to 46.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 21.6% for Mercury and 49.5% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
MercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderInceptionAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.638.1
Released—2025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked925

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury leads

Mercury: 38.7 (#170), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding13221412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mercury: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mercury: 17.5 (#293), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark21.6%49.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts12851372

Math Not comparable

Mercury: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math—1365

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert—1338

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mercury: 41.6 (#206), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English12601346
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena French—1398
LMArena German—1325
LMArena Japanese—1310
LMArena Korean—1305
LMArena Russian—1366
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mercury: 65.2 (#224), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12391355

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mercury: 38.4 (#198), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12661378

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mercury: 46.2 (#221), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text12821357
LMArena Creative Writing11911333
LMArena Multi-Turn12821365

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Mercury and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.6 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Mercury or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mercury and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper