Model comparison

Mercury vs Mistral Small

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.4

Rank #243 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Small in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small leads 52.5 to 46.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 21.6% for Mercury and 37.8% for Mistral Small.
  • Mistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury and Mistral Small specifications
MercuryMistral Small
ProviderInceptionMistral AI
Noometry Index37.633.4
Released—2024-02-26
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked939

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury leads

Mercury: 38.7 (#170), Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMistral Small
LMArena Coding13221362
SciCode—26.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct—36.1%
LiveBench Coding—36.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—46.6%
ALE-Bench—497.62

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mercury: —, Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMistral Small
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.1%

Reasoning Mistral Small leads

Mercury: 17.5 (#293), Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMistral Small
Kagi LLM Benchmark21.6%37.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts12851335
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—44.8%
DTBench—70.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—53.7%
LMCA—20.6%
LiveBench—44%

Math Not comparable

Mercury: —, Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMistral Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—5.8%
LiveBench Math—39.9%
LMArena Math—1341
MATH Level 5—46.8%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury: —, Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMistral Small
GPQA Diamond—47.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%
LMArena Expert—1291
MMLU—68.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mercury: —, Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMistral Small
LMArena Vision—1142

Multilingual Mistral Small leads

Mercury: 41.6 (#206), Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMistral Small
LMArena Non-English12601315
LMArena Chinese—1340
LMArena French—1337
LMArena German—1340
LMArena Japanese—1275
LMArena Korean—1259
LMArena Russian—1324
LMArena Spanish—1346

Instruction Following Mistral Small leads

Mercury: 65.2 (#224), Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following12391310
LiveBench Instruction Following—63.7%

Long Context Mistral Small leads

Mercury: 38.4 (#198), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMistral Small
LMArena Longer Query12661327

Writing & Preference Mistral Small leads

Mercury: 46.2 (#221), Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryMistral Small
LMArena Text12821338
LMArena Creative Writing11911305
LMArena Multi-Turn12821344
LiveBench Language—30.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury better than Mistral Small?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mercury or Mistral Small better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mercury and Mistral Small share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper