Model comparison
Mercury vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 46.2.
Side by side
| Mercury | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 43.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Mercury: 38.7 (#170), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1466 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Mercury: 17.5 (#293), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1285 | 1445 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
Mercury: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1430 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mercury: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Mercury: 41.6 (#206), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Mercury: 65.2 (#224), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Mercury: 38.4 (#198), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Mercury: 46.2 (#221), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1191 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1282 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mercury or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mercury and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.