Model comparison
Magistral Small vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 26.4 to 6.8.
Side by side
| Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Small better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Magistral Small or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.