Model comparison

Magistral Small vs MiniMax M1

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiniMax M1 leads 26.9 to 6.8.
  • Magistral Small is cheaper at $0.50 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.55 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
  • MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Magistral Small and MiniMax M1 specifications
Magistral SmallMiniMax M1
ProviderMistral AIMiniMax
Noometry Index30.240.3
Released2025-06-102025-06-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1M
Max output40K40K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.55
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$2.20
Results tracked1018

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiniMax M1
SciCode35.2%—
LMArena Coding—1359

Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiniMax M1
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
ARC-AGI-15%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1339
DTBench61.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19—

Math MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiniMax M1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%—
LMArena Math—1361

Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiniMax M1
GPQA Diamond56.1%—
LMArena Expert—1317

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English—1319
LMArena Chinese—1360
LMArena French—1370
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1217
LMArena Korean—1266
LMArena Russian—1329
LMArena Spanish—1353

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following—1312

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiniMax M1
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%
LMArena Longer Query—1326

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiniMax M1
LMArena Text—1343
LMArena Creative Writing—1298
LMArena Multi-Turn—1335

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or MiniMax M1?

Magistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.55 and $2.20.

Is Magistral Small or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and MiniMax M1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper