Model comparison

Magistral Small vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 6.8.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
  • Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Magistral Small and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
Magistral SmallMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
Noometry Index30.243.6
Released2025-06-102026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K262K
Max output40K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$0.28
Results tracked1018

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Omni
SciCode35.2%—
LMArena Coding—1466

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Omni
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
ARC-AGI-15%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1445
DTBench61.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19—

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Omni
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%—
LMArena Math—1430

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Omni
GPQA Diamond56.1%—
LMArena Expert—1449

Multimodal Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English—1404
LMArena Chinese—1465
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1399
LMArena Japanese—1317
LMArena Korean—1355
LMArena Russian—1412
LMArena Spanish—1434

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following—1428

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query—1442

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text—1423
LMArena Creative Writing—1392
LMArena Multi-Turn—1445

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

Is Magistral Small or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper