Model comparison

Magistral Small vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 26.8 to 6.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.3% for Magistral Small and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Magistral Small and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Magistral SmallMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
Noometry Index30.245.2
Released2025-06-102026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1.05M
Max output40K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$0.87
Results tracked1027

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.5-Pro
SciCode35.2%50.2%
LMArena WebDev—1479
LMArena Coding—1503
ALE-Bench—899.8

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.5-Pro
CritPt0.3%4%
DTBench61.3%84.5%
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
ARC-AGI-15%—
Chess Puzzles3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1488
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.5-Pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%—
ProofBench—22%
LMArena Math—1481

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.5-Pro
GPQA Diamond56.1%—
LMArena Expert—1503

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1449
LMArena Chinese—1507
LMArena French—1488
LMArena German—1458
LMArena Japanese—1412
LMArena Korean—1437
LMArena Russian—1450
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1483

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text—1465
LMArena Creative Writing—1440
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

Is Magistral Small or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper