Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

37.3

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 21.6 to 8.6.
  • Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • Magistral Medium accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Step 3.7 Flash specifications
Magistral MediumStep 3.7 Flash
ProviderMistral AIStepFun
Noometry Index35.237.3
Released2025-03-172026-05-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K256K
Max output16K256K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$5$1.11
Results tracked225

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumStep 3.7 Flash
SciCode39.2%40%
LMArena Coding1319—
ALE-Bench—694.12

Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumStep 3.7 Flash
CritPt0.3%2.3%
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—39.7%
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—

Math Step 3.7 Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumStep 3.7 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—68.5%
LMArena Math1250—

Knowledge Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Expert1223—

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1232—
LMArena Chinese1227—
LMArena French1267—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Russian1224—
LMArena Spanish1271—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1254—

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1295—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1245—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.1 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Magistral Medium does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Step 3.7 Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper