Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

37.6

Rank #201 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 28.0 to 8.6.
  • Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.49 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B specifications
Magistral MediumQwen3.6 35B-A3B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.237.6
Released2025-03-172026-04-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output16K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$5$1.49
Results tracked2214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.2 (#196)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.6 35B-A3B
SciCode39.2%35.8%
WeirdML—34.5%
LMArena Coding1319—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Magistral Medium: —, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 22.1 (#134)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.6 35B-A3B
Terminal-Bench—23%

Reasoning Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 28.0 (#109)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.6 35B-A3B
CritPt0.3%0.3%
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—41.6%
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
Chess Puzzles—26%
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—
Mystery Game Puzzles—22%
DTBench—73.9%
LMCA—29.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—44.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.93

Math Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 38.9 (#121)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.6 35B-A3B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—20.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1250—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.3 (#68)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.6 35B-A3B
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
LMArena Expert1223—

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English1232—
LMArena Chinese1227—
LMArena French1267—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Russian1224—
LMArena Spanish1271—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following1254—

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query1295—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1245—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.49 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 37.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper