Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Qwen3.5-9B

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 24× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Magistral Medium's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-9B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #236 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5-9B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 23.1 to 8.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 39.2% for Magistral Medium and 27.5% for Qwen3.5-9B.
  • Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Qwen3.5-9B specifications
Magistral MediumQwen3.5-9B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.233.8
Released2025-03-172026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output16K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$5$0.15
Results tracked2210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.5-9B
SciCode39.2%27.5%
LMArena Coding1319—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Magistral Medium: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.5-9B
Terminal-Bench—9.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.5-9B leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.5-9B
CritPt0.3%0.3%
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
Chess Puzzles—12%
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—
DTBench—71.2%
LMCA—24.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.46

Math Too close to call

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.5-9B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—48.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—61.7%
LMArena Math1250—

Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.5-9B
GPQA Diamond—79%
LMArena Expert1223—

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Non-English1232—
LMArena Chinese1227—
LMArena French1267—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Russian1224—
LMArena Spanish1271—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Instruction Following1254—

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Longer Query1295—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1245—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 24× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Magistral Medium's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Qwen3.5-9B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper