Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Magistral Medium's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

30.1

Rank #297 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Magistral Medium leads 35.1 to 16.2.
  • Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • Magistral Medium accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct specifications
Magistral MediumQwen2.5 32B Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.230.1
Released2025-03-172024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K131K
Max output16K8K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$5$2.80
Results tracked227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen2.5 32B Instruct
SciCode39.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45%
LMArena Coding1319—
BigCodeBench Complete—52.3%

Reasoning Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen2.5 32B Instruct
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.52

Math Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen2.5 32B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.4%
LMArena Math1250—
MATH Level 5—56.1%

Knowledge Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen2.5 32B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—46.1%
LMArena Expert1223—

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1232—
LMArena Chinese1227—
LMArena French1267—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Russian1224—
LMArena Spanish1271—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1254—

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1295—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1245—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Magistral Medium's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.1 vs 38.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Magistral Medium does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper