Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 22.6 to 8.7.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Magistral MediumOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index34.832.2
Released2025-03-17—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$5—
Results tracked2216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding13191210
SciCode39.2%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12671208
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
CritPt0.3%—

Math Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12491208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1222—

Multilingual Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12321160
LMArena Chinese12251192
LMArena Russian12241187
LMArena French1268—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1176—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Spanish1269—

Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12541186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12951194

Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12551218
LMArena Creative Writing12451199
LMArena Multi-Turn12751221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Magistral Medium or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper