Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs o3-pro

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index. Magistral Medium costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.7

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 1 category and o3-pro in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.1 to 39.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 16.2% for Magistral Medium and 72.1% for o3-pro.
  • Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • o3-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and o3-pro specifications
Magistral Mediumo3-pro
ProviderMistral AIOpenAI
Noometry Index34.842.7
Released2025-03-172025-06-10
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K200K
Max output16K100K
Input $ / M tokens$2$20
Output $ / M tokens$5$80
Results tracked2212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161), o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Mediumo3-pro
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
SciCode39.2%—
WeirdML—58.2%
LMArena Coding1319—

Reasoning o3-pro leads

Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342), o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Mediumo3-pro
ARC-AGI-20%4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%72.1%
ARC-AGI-16.1%59.3%
CritPt0.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—
DTBench—86.9%
LMCA—38.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.43

Math Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Mediumo3-pro
LMArena Math1249—

Knowledge Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199), o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Mediumo3-pro
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.3%
LMArena Expert1222—

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219), o3-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Mediumo3-pro
LMArena Non-English1232—
LMArena Chinese1225—
LMArena French1268—
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1176—
LMArena Korean1125—
LMArena Russian1224—
LMArena Spanish1269—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207), o3-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Mediumo3-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1254—

Long Context o3-pro leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178), o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Mediumo3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench—97.2%
LMArena Longer Query1295—

Writing & Preference o3-pro leads

Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214), o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Mediumo3-pro
LMArena Text1255—
LMArena Creative Writing1245—
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than o3-pro?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index. Magistral Medium costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or o3-pro?

Magistral Medium is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is Magistral Medium or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

o3-pro does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and o3-pro share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper