Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs MiniMax M1

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiniMax M1 leads 26.9 to 8.6.
  • MiniMax M1 is cheaper at $0.55 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and MiniMax M1 specifications
Magistral MediumMiniMax M1
ProviderMistral AIMiniMax
Noometry Index35.240.3
Released2025-03-172025-06-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K1M
Max output16K40K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.55
Output $ / M tokens$5$2.20
Results tracked2218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiniMax M1
LMArena Coding13191359
SciCode39.2%—

Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts12671339
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—
CritPt0.3%—

Math MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiniMax M1
LMArena Math12501361

Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiniMax M1
LMArena Expert12231317

Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English12321319
LMArena Chinese12271360
LMArena French12671370
LMArena German12481350
LMArena Japanese11751217
LMArena Korean11251266
LMArena Russian12241329
LMArena Spanish12711353

Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following12541312

Long Context MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query12951326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiniMax M1
LMArena Text12551343
LMArena Creative Writing12451298
LMArena Multi-Turn12751335

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.1 vs 39.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and MiniMax M1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper