Model comparison
Magistral Medium vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 46.3.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-17 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1457 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1250 | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1478 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1227 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1267 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1248 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1271 | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1445 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Medium better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.
Is Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.