Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs o1-mini

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 8 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 48.4.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and o1-mini specifications
Longcat Flash Chato1-mini
ProviderMeituanOpenAI
Noometry Index42.134.0
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1939

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash Chato1-mini
LMArena Coding14711362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash Chato1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash Chato1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts14401333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash Chato1-mini
LMArena Math14421358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash Chato1-mini
LMArena Expert14541316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash Chato1-mini
LMArena Non-English14041289
LMArena Chinese14651314
LMArena French14561293
LMArena German14081278
LMArena Japanese13731245
LMArena Korean13711223
LMArena Russian13951283
LMArena Spanish14451303

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash Chato1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following14111304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash Chato1-mini
LMArena Longer Query14251320

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash Chato1-mini
LMArena Text14271317
LMArena Creative Writing13881244
LMArena Multi-Turn14181314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than o1-mini?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or o1-mini better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and o1-mini share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper