Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Mistral Small 3.1

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 14.7.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
Longcat Flash ChatMistral Small 3.1
ProviderMeituanMistral AI
Noometry Index42.131.7
Released—2025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—102K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$0.56
Results tracked1928

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Coding14711309

Reasoning Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Hard Prompts14401278
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.48

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Math14421262
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.9%
Omni-MATH—24.8%

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Expert14541257
GPQA Diamond—41.9%
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English14041255
LMArena Chinese14651253
LMArena French14561273
LMArena German14081266
LMArena Japanese13731208
LMArena Korean13711206
LMArena Russian13951263
LMArena Spanish14451283

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following14111264
IFEval—75%

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query14251299

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text14271277
LMArena Creative Writing13881253
LMArena Multi-Turn14181270
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761
WildBench—78.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper