Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #266 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 19.0 to 10.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat and 6.5% for Mistral Medium 3.1.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and Mistral Medium 3.1 specifications
Longcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.1
ProviderMeituanMistral AI
Noometry Index42.131.9
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—131K
Max output—105K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked193

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Coding1471—

Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.1
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%6.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
Thematic Generalization—20.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1440—

Math Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Math1442—

Knowledge Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Expert1454—

Multilingual Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Non-English1404—
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1408—
LMArena Japanese1373—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Russian1395—
LMArena Spanish1445—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following1411—

Long Context Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Longer Query1425—

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text1427—
LMArena Creative Writing1388—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1476
LMArena Multi-Turn1418—

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper