Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Yi-1.5-34B

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 1 category and Yi-1.5-34B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Yi-1.5-34B leads 37.4 to 31.6.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatYi-1.5-34B
ProviderNVIDIA01.AI
Noometry Index31.830.6
Released—2024-05-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding10251169
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts10471160

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math10721182
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond—32%
LMArena Expert—1144

Multilingual Yi-1.5-34B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English10631121
LMArena Chinese—1213
LMArena French—1156
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021
LMArena Korean—1005
LMArena Russian—1091
LMArena Spanish—1121

Instruction Following Yi-1.5-34B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following10601139

Long Context Yi-1.5-34B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query9981143

Writing & Preference Yi-1.5-34B leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text10981173
LMArena Creative Writing10911135
LMArena Multi-Turn10581153

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Yi-1.5-34B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper