Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.2 to 31.6.
  • Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.847.5
Released—2026-03-31
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked937

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Coding10251467
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts10471449
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.65

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Math10721450
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.6 Plus
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%
LMArena Expert—1454

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English10631424
LMArena Chinese—1477
LMArena French—1455
LMArena German—1452
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1379
LMArena Russian—1434
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following10601425

Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Longer Query9981439
CL-bench—20.3%

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text10981437
LMArena Creative Writing10911404
LMArena Multi-Turn10581438

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper