Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Qwen1.5-7B
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-7B leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1107 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1065 |
Math Too close to call
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1080 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1058 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-7B leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Qwen1.5-7B share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.