Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 54.2 to 47.7.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.827.9
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked935

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding10251093
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10471072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math10721111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert—1045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10631021
LMArena Chinese—1021
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Russian—1022
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10601053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query9981044

Writing & Preference Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text10981073
LMArena Creative Writing10911037
LMArena Multi-Turn10581018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper