Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.8 to 26.0.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1016 |
Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 993 |
Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223), Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1018 |
Multilingual Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1064 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 946 |
Instruction Following Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1061 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | — |
Writing & Preference Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278), Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.3 vs 29.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.