Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 31.6.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 39.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1347 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1322 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1299 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.