Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.6 to 31.6.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 40.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1371 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.91 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math o1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1361 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena French | — | 1344 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and o1 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.