Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs MiniMax-M2

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.0 to 31.6.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiniMax-M2
ProviderNVIDIAMiniMax
Noometry Index31.837.4
Released—2025-10-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiniMax-M2
LMArena Coding10251370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
LMArena WebDev—1297

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning Too close to call

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiniMax-M2
LMArena Hard Prompts10471357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiniMax-M2
LMArena Math10721352

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert—1337

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English10631313
LMArena Chinese—1366
LMArena French—1335
LMArena German—1355
LMArena Russian—1331
LMArena Spanish—1326

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following10601328

Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query9981331

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiniMax-M2
LMArena Text10981340
LMArena Creative Writing10911286
LMArena Multi-Turn10581361

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and MiniMax-M2 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper