Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 31.6.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and MiMo-V2-Flash specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderNVIDIAXiaomi
Noometry Index31.841.3
Released—2025-12-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding10251443
LMArena WebDev—1330
SciCode—25.9%
ALE-Bench—737.95

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10471420
CritPt—0%

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math10721396

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert—1425

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English10631392
LMArena Chinese—1462
LMArena French—1429
LMArena German—1395
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1358
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10601392

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query9981409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text10981411
LMArena Creative Writing10911375
LMArena Multi-Turn10581404

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper