Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.2

Rank #265 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.8 to 31.8.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and MiMo-V2.5 specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.5
ProviderNVIDIAXiaomi
Noometry Index31.243.0
Released—2026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295), MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Coding10251469
LMArena WebDev—1438
SciCode—43.1%
ALE-Bench—513.95

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245), MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10471450
CritPt—3.7%

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223), MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Math10721436
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Expert—1459

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265), MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English10641404
LMArena Chinese—1467
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1421
LMArena Japanese—1304
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Russian—1395
LMArena Spanish—1412

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274), MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following10611433

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283), MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query9981444

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278), MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text10981427
LMArena Creative Writing10911392
LMArena Multi-Turn10581445

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and MiMo-V2.5 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper