Model comparison

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Maverick costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.

Llama 4 Maverick Meta

30.9

Rank #282 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 4 Maverick scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 31.1 to 10.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 55.9% for Llama 4 Maverick and 66.7% for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
  • Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper at $0.19 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $2 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Llama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.943.0
Released2025-04-052025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K131K
Max output4K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.19$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.65$2
Results tracked5425

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 4 Maverick: 26.6 (#324), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding13021440
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)21%—
Aider Polyglot15.6%—
SciCode33.1%—
WeirdML24.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct49.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete61.4%—
ALE-Bench172.97—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 28.2 (#91), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.3%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#342), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.9%66.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts12811428
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench27.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)8%—
ARC-AGI-14.4%—
CritPt0%—
EnigmaEval0.6%—
DTBench61.9%—
LMCA15.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index132.2—
ForecastBench57.5—

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 4 Maverick: 26.0 (#262), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Omni-MATH42.2%46.7%
LMArena Math12991440
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202520.6%—
MATH Level 573%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 4 Maverick: 33.4 (#204), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
MMLU-Pro81%78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%9.3%
GPQA (HELM)65%63%
LMArena Expert12591417
GPQA Diamond67%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.7%—
Confabulations22.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 31.6 (#105), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Vision1142—
GeoBench52%—
SpatialViz-Bench31.8%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 4 Maverick: 42.2 (#195), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English12691407
LMArena Chinese12771460
LMArena French12591413
LMArena German12911417
LMArena Japanese12071395
LMArena Korean12031364
LMArena Russian12861404
LMArena Spanish12931435

Instruction Following Too close to call

Llama 4 Maverick: 71.7 (#146), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
IFEval90.8%81%
LMArena Instruction Following12671389

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#279), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench46.2%55.6%
LMArena Longer Query12801403

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 4 Maverick: 38.8 (#252), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text12871417
LMArena Creative Writing12671334
WildBench80%80.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn12891416
Short-Story Creative Writing62%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing860—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Maverick costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct lists at $0.50 and $2.

Is Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 4 Maverick has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper