Model comparison

Llama 4 Maverick vs Phi-3.5-MoE

Llama 4 Maverick has enough public results to be ranked (#276); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Llama 4 Maverick Meta

30.6

Rank #276 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Side by side

Llama 4 Maverick and Phi-3.5-MoE specifications
Llama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.6—
Released2025-04-052024-08-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.19—
Output $ / M tokens$0.65—
Results tracked543

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 26.3 (#318), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)21%—
Aider Polyglot15.6%—
SciCode33.1%—
WeirdML24.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct49.7%—
LMArena Coding1302—
BigCodeBench Complete61.4%—
ALE-Bench172.97—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 27.9 (#86), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#337), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench27.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)8%—
ARC-AGI-14.4%—
CritPt0%—
EnigmaEval0.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1281—
DTBench61.9%—
LMCA15.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index132.2—
ForecastBench57.5—
PIQA—88.6%

Math Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 24.6 (#256), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202520.6%—
Omni-MATH42.2%—
LMArena Math1299—
MATH Level 573%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—
GSM8K—88.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 33.3 (#196), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
GPQA Diamond67%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.7%—
MMLU-Pro81%—
Confabulations22.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—
LMArena Expert1259—
BoolQ—84.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 30.9 (#100), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Vision1141—
GeoBench52%—
SpatialViz-Bench31.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 42.4 (#190), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Non-English1269—
LMArena Chinese1277—
LMArena French1258—
LMArena German1291—
LMArena Japanese1207—
LMArena Korean1203—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1293—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 71.9 (#140), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
IFEval90.8%—
LMArena Instruction Following1267—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#274), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
Fiction.LiveBench46.2%—
LMArena Longer Query1280—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 4 Maverick: 39.0 (#247), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Text1287—
LMArena Creative Writing1266—
Short-Story Creative Writing62%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing860—
WildBench80%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1289—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

Llama 4 Maverick has enough public results to be ranked (#276); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Maverick and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 4 Maverick has 54 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper