Model comparison
Llama 4 Maverick vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 4 Maverick scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 26.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 33.1% for Llama 4 Maverick and 51.3% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $0.65 for Llama 4 Maverick.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 48.5 |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.19 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.65 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 4 Maverick: 26.6 (#324), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 33.1% | 51.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1302 | 1504 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 21% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 15.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| WeirdML | 24.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 61.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 172.97 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 4 Maverick: 28.2 (#91), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 37.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#342), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1281 | 1482 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 55.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 4.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.9% | — |
| LMCA | 15.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 132.2 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.5 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 4 Maverick: 26.0 (#262), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1299 | 1468 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 20.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| Omni-MATH | 42.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 73% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.7% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 4 Maverick: 33.4 (#204), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1259 | 1501 |
| GPQA Diamond | 67% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 5.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 81% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 4 Maverick: 31.6 (#105), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1142 | 1259 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 31.8% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 4 Maverick: 42.2 (#195), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1269 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1277 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1259 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1293 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 4 Maverick: 71.7 (#146), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | 1463 |
| IFEval | 90.8% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#279), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | 1463 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 46.2% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Llama 4 Maverick: 38.8 (#252), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1267 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1289 | 1451 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 62% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 860 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 4 Maverick better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Maverick lists at $0.19 and $0.65.
Is Llama 4 Maverick or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Llama 4 Maverick and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 4 Maverick has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.