Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 5 Preview leads 46.1 to 8.8.
  • Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Step 5 Preview specifications
Llama 3-8BStep 5 Preview
ProviderMetaStepFun
Noometry Index25.547.9
Released2024-04-182026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked3418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Coding11521480
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts11331465
CritPt—20.9%
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench43.9%—
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math11511470
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
ProofBench—42%
MATH Level 56.1%—

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert11131470
GPQA Diamond26.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3-8B: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English10981432
LMArena Chinese10761519
LMArena Russian11091436
LMArena Spanish11731439
LMArena French1159—
LMArena German1104—
LMArena Japanese967—
LMArena Korean1004—

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following11271444

Long Context Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query11281455

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text11661442
LMArena Creative Writing11501410
LMArena Multi-Turn11521447

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Step 5 Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper