Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 41.8 to 7.8.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Llama 3-8BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.543.0
Released2024-04-182025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked3425

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding11521440
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11331428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench43.9%—
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math11511440
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
Omni-MATH—46.7%
MATH Level 56.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Expert11131417
GPQA Diamond26.1%—
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English10981407
LMArena Chinese10761460
LMArena French11591413
LMArena German11041417
LMArena Japanese9671395
LMArena Korean10041364
LMArena Russian11091404
LMArena Spanish11731435

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11271389
IFEval—81%

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11281403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text11661417
LMArena Creative Writing11501334
LMArena Multi-Turn11521416
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper