Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.1

Rank #119 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 38.8 to 7.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 43.9% for Llama 3-8B and 84.3% for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B specifications
Llama 3-8BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.542.1
Released2024-04-182026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked3427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Coding11521436
LMArena WebDev—1360
SciCode—35.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Hard Prompts11331421
DTBench43.9%84.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—51.7%
CritPt—0.9%
Chess Puzzles0%—
Thematic Generalization—51.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
LMCA—32.2%
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Math11511432
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
MATH Level 56.1%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Expert11131432
GPQA Diamond26.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3-8B: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Non-English10981400
LMArena Chinese10761462
LMArena French11591442
LMArena German11041426
LMArena Japanese9671367
LMArena Korean10041352
LMArena Russian11091400
LMArena Spanish11731424

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Instruction Following11271399

Long Context Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Longer Query11281410

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Text11661417
LMArena Creative Writing11501368
LMArena Multi-Turn11521416

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper