Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Qwen Plus

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Plus leads 27.4 to 7.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 6.1% for Llama 3-8B and 65.3% for Qwen Plus.
  • Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Qwen Plus specifications
Llama 3-8BQwen Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.537.1
Released2024-04-182024-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked3420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Plus
LMArena Coding11521328
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts11331317
DTBench43.9%81.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.3%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMCA—24%
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%17.8%
LMArena Math11511326
MATH Level 56.1%65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Plus
GPQA Diamond26.1%48.1%
LMArena Expert11131328
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multilingual Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English10981310
LMArena Chinese10761347
LMArena Japanese9671251
LMArena Russian11091323
LMArena French1159—
LMArena German1104—
LMArena Korean1004—
LMArena Spanish1173—

Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following11271303

Long Context Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query11281324

Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Plus
LMArena Text11661326
LMArena Creative Writing11501293
LMArena Multi-Turn11521336

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Qwen Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper