Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 37.5 to 7.8.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
Llama 3-8BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index25.540.0
Released2024-04-182026-08-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.20
Results tracked3418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Coding11521375
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts11331337
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench43.9%—
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Math11511359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
MATH Level 56.1%—

Knowledge Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Expert11131356
GPQA Diamond26.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multilingual Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English10981295
LMArena Chinese10761359
LMArena French11591366
LMArena German11041282
LMArena Japanese9671206
LMArena Korean10041238
LMArena Russian11091253
LMArena Spanish11731345

Instruction Following Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following11271318

Long Context Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query11281314

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text11661327
LMArena Creative Writing11501254
LMArena Multi-Turn11521328
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1280

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better for coding?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper