Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Mistral 7B

Llama 3-8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 25.5 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 32 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Mistral 7B Mistral AI

23.0

Rank #351 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 32 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3-8B leads 37.5 to 30.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 31.9% for Llama 3-8B and 19.5% for Mistral 7B.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Mistral 7B specifications
Llama 3-8BMistral 7B
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index25.523.0
Released2024-04-182023-09-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—8K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.25
Results tracked3437

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral 7B
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%19.5%
LMArena Coding11521082
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%27.3%
HumanEval+56.7%36%
MBPP+54.8%42.1%

Reasoning Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral 7B
Chess Puzzles0%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts11331067
DTBench43.9%42.5%
Adversarial NLI57.3%47.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45112.21
WinoGrande75.7%75.3%
BIG-Bench Hard—56.1%
ForecastBench58.6—
HellaSwag—81%
PIQA—83%

Math Too close to call

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral 7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%0.3%
LMArena Math11511085
MATH Level 56.1%3.7%
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge Too close to call

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral 7B
GPQA Diamond26.1%15.2%
LMArena Expert11131036
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%78.6%
MMLU68.8%62.5%
OpenBookQA82.6%79.8%
TriviaQA67.7%75.2%
BoolQ—87.4%

Multilingual Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral 7B
LMArena Non-English10981012
LMArena Chinese10761009
LMArena French11591037
LMArena German1104987
LMArena Japanese967878
LMArena Russian11091018
LMArena Spanish11731026
LMArena Korean1004—

Instruction Following Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral 7B
LMArena Instruction Following11271060

Long Context Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral 7B
LMArena Longer Query11281060

Writing & Preference Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BMistral 7B
LMArena Text11661090
LMArena Creative Writing11501068
LMArena Multi-Turn11521062

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Mistral 7B?

Llama 3-8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 25.5 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Mistral 7B better for coding?

Llama 3-8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.0 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Mistral 7B share?

32 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper