Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

37.6

Rank #201 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 51.3 to 20.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.3% for Llama 3-70B and 86.7% for Qwen3.6 35B-A3B.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B specifications
Llama 3-70BQwen3.6 35B-A3B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.837.6
Released2024-04-182026-04-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$1.49
Results tracked3114

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.2 (#196)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.6 35B-A3B
SciCode—35.8%
WeirdML—34.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
LMArena Coding1206—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 22.1 (#134)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.6 35B-A3B
Terminal-Bench—23%
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 28.0 (#109)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.6 35B-A3B
DTBench54.2%73.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93143.93
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—41.6%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—26%
LMArena Hard Prompts1195—
Mystery Game Puzzles—22%
LMCA—29.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—44.4%
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 38.9 (#121)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.6 35B-A3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—20.4%
LMArena Math1218—
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.3 (#68)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.6 35B-A3B
GPQA Diamond40.6%84.8%
LMArena Expert1149—
MMLU79.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1114—
LMArena French1232—
LMArena German1169—
LMArena Japanese1017—
LMArena Korean1017—
LMArena Russian1159—
LMArena Spanish1241—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following1194—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query1174—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Text1221—
LMArena Creative Writing1210—
LMArena Multi-Turn1223—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.2 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper