Model comparison
Llama 3-70B vs Qwen-7B
Llama 3-70B has enough public results to be ranked (#317); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Llama 3-70B | Qwen-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.5 | — |
| Released | 2024-04-18 | 2023-09-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 31 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1206 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.91 | 106.47 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1195 | — |
| DTBench | 54.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 45% |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LAMBADA | — | 67.9% |
| PIQA | — | 77.9% |
| WinoGrande | 83.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1218 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 51.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 79.3% | 45% |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1149 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 76.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1114 | — |
| LMArena French | 1231 | — |
| LMArena German | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1017 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1159 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1241 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1194 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1174 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1221 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1223 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3-70B better than Qwen-7B?
Llama 3-70B has enough public results to be ranked (#317); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Qwen-7B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.